State Legislators Suggest Changes to School Funding System

Written by on March 26, 2012 in Uncategorized - No comments

ANNAPOLIS—In an effort to help counties match state school spending, legislators have introduced a bill to help fix what many consider to be a broken maintenance of effort law.

Currently, the maintenance of effort law requires that individual counties match the amount of funding the state gives them for local education, and makes counties provide equal or greater funding to education than in previous years. Last year, seven counties—Anne Arundel, Dorchester, Kent, Montgomery, Queen Anne’s, Talbot and Wicomico—did not match education funding set in the previous budgeting cycle.

Under the new bill, counties that can’t match the previous year’s funding would be required to apply for a waiver, which would exempt the county from matching for one year.

“It’s going to provide some stability and predictability to the school system,” said Delegate John L. Bohanan Jr, D-St. Mary’s, who co-sponsored the bill.

The bill also attempts to fix problems associated with rebasing, which occurs when counties’ contributions reset after they fail to meet their yearly funding expectation and don’t apply for a waiver.

The bill would allow a county to reset its baseline of school funding if it can prove to the State Board of Education that it is unable to make the payment, or if it paid extra in previous years.

“If you’ve gone over your maintenance of effort funding, like Montgomery County has, then that should be recognized,” Bohanan said.

However, waivers or rebasing options would not be granted to counties that have not made a satisfactory effort, which would be determined by the State Board of Education.

“Essentially, good actors would be given room to rebase their funding, but we would not want counties that underfund education to be allowed to rebase,” said Delegate Anne Kaiser, D-Montgomery, who co-sponsored the bill.

The bill would also allow counties to increase property taxes over current tax caps—provided that the additional revenue collected is only used for funding education, said Bohanan.

Forcing counties to pay for the state’s bad financial decisions is unacceptable, said Anne Arundel County Executive John R. Leopold in a phone interview Tuesday.

Anne Arundel County already spends 52 percent of its budget on schools, which does not leave enough room in the budget for other institutions like libraries, he said.

Leopold called the property tax idea “a menu of distasteful dietary choices causing acute indigestion.”

Sean Johnson, managing director of legislative affairs for the Maryland State Education Association, called the bill a great step in the right direction.

“It’s a comprehensive bill that deals with a lot of major aspects that we wanted maintenance of effort laws to address,” he said.

Johnson also defended the section on exceeding property taxes, saying that counties were not required to do so, and should only raise taxes “if it’s the only thing keeping counties from (meeting their funding levels.)”

At a town hall meeting hosted by the Maryland State Education Association on Monday night, members of the education community voiced their concerns about counties taking on more costs from maintenance of effort, as well as a proposal to shift part of teacher pension costs from the state to the county level.

“We are $127 million in the hole in Prince George’s County. If you add the $37 million in teacher pensions, it will have a devastating impact, not only on our school system, but also on the county,” said Sen. Joanne C. Benson, D-Prince George’s, who is a former educator, at Monday’s meeting.

Benson said the “big three” in Annapolis—Montgomery and Prince George’s counties, and Baltimore—would stand together and fight a shift in teacher pensions.

By Mike Bock and Tim Ebner
Capital News Service

Leave a Comment